Everything You Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Ask: "Lewd Conduct in Public" Edition

I've previously written here about section 647 of the California Penal Code.  Commonly referred to as "Disorderly Conduct", PC 647 prohibits everything from prostitution to peeping, loitering, sleeping in parks and being drunk in public.  Subsection (a), though, is the topic of today's post.

PC 647(a) makes it a misdemeanor to engage in any "lewd or dissolute conduct" in any public place or in any place that is exposed to public view.  To be convicted of this offense, the prosecutor must establish 5 elements:

• That the defendant willfully touched his or her own genitals, buttocks or female breasts (or the genitals, buttocks or female breasts of another person),
• That the defendant acted with the intent to arouse or gratify him / herself or another person, or to annoy or offend another person, 
• The defendant was in a public place or a place that was open to public view, 
• Someone else who might have been offended was present, AND
• The defendant knew or should have known that another person who might be offended was present. 

That's a lot of unpack, and a lot of elements that may be open to some interpretation and argument.  Put simply though, the DA must prove that the defendant was doing something sexual in public view with the knowledge that he could be seen by someone who might not want to see whatever the defendant was doing.

It's interesting to note that breasts are only considered "lewd" on women.  If a man rubs his own bare nipples (or if someone else rubs a man's nipples) in public, there's no crime.  

In my previous post re: Drunk in Public cases, I explained that the legal definition of "public place" includes any place that is generally open and accessible to members of the public. This includes inside private businesses, on roads, in parking spaces, and even your own front porch.  Since it wouldn't be considered "trespassing" for a salesman to walk up your driveway and knock on your door, those spaces are considered "public places" for the purposes of PC 647.  The same is true for common hallways and courtyards in apartment buildings.  

The next two elements are where a lot of people get tripped up.  To constitute the crime of 647(a), the DA must prove that another person who might have been offended was present.  They do not have to prove that the onlooker was, in fact, offended.  The prosecutor must also prove that the defendant knew or should have known about the onlooker's presence, but they do not have to prove that the defendant intended to be seen.  

Even though PC 647(a) is a non-violent misdemeanor, it may carry heavy penalties, including jail time, probation, mandatory counseling, stay-away orders, fines and community service.  

There are many possible defenses to the charge of 647(a).  The best strategy in your particular case, though, will depend on the unique facts and circumstances surrounding your arrest. 

If you or a loved one has questions about PC 647(a) in California, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John. 

Thanks for reading. 

Fullerton Criminal Defense Attorney

Can I Be Arrested for Being "Drunk in Public" on Private Property?

Section 647(f) of the California Penal Code makes it a misdemeanor to appear in a "public place" while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

In "drunk in public" cases, the question often arises over what technically constitutes a "public place".  There is a common myth that "drunk in public" laws are unenforceable inside bars because bars are private property.  This is false.

Under California law, a "public place" is defined as any place that is generally open and accessible to anyone who wishes to go there.  This includes private businesses that invite members of the public onto their premises.  Bars are considered to be "public places" in California.

Since roads, highways, and even parking spaces are open and accessible to the public, California courts have ruled that they also qualify as "public places" for the purposes of PC 647(f).  This means that you can be arrested for being drunk in public if you are found intoxicated inside a vehicle while the car is in a public place (on the road or parked somewhere publicly).

In some states, you can be arrested for being intoxicated in a place that is visible to the public.  In California, though, it is not necessarily illegal to be under the influence of alcohol while exposed to public view.  It is perfectly legal for adults to get inebriated inside their own homes in California, regardless of whether or not they are visible to neighbors.

The front lawn of a private residence, however, is a different story.  In the landmark case of People v. Olson (1971) 18 Cal.App.3. 594, a California appellate court ruled that the area between the street and the front door of a private residence (including the lawn and porch) are considered to be "public places" for the purposes of PC 647(f).  Since it would not be considered "trespassing" for a stranger (e.g. a salesman, a Girl Scout, a mail carrier, etc.) to approach the front door of a private home, that area is considered to be "open and accessible", and therefore "public".  This means you can be arrested for being "drunk in public" on your own front lawn.  The same is true for common hallways and courtyards of apartment buildings -- if those areas are generally open to members of the public who may pass through while conducting lawful business, then they are considered to be "public places".

In my view, there are still some unanswered questions here.  What if, for example, your front lawn is enclosed with a white picket fence?  Is that still considered "open and accessible"?  What if you have a "No Trespassing / No Solicitors" sign posted?  How about a super exclusive, members-only bar?  Or a Masonic Lodge?  Are these places "open to the public"?  I could see arguments going both ways.

There are many possible defenses to PC 647(f) charges in California.  The best strategy in your particular case will depend on the unique facts and circumstances.  Our office has extensive experience in fighting "drunk in public" charges throughout Southern California.

If you or a loved one has questions about a "drunk in public" case in California, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Fullerton Criminal Defense Lawyer

How Long Will it Take to Resolve My Criminal Case?

One of the most common complaints I hear from my clients is that their case is taking much longer to resolve than they had anticipated.  Unfortunately, many defendants unrealistically expect that their complicated legal issues can quickly and easily be settled with a couple phone calls. Some clients believe that a lawyer can simply explain their defense to the judge and the court will immediately dismiss the case and apologize for the inconvenience.  If things were that simple, my job would be a lot easier.

As a criminal defense attorney, part of my job is to explain the process so that my clients know what to expect, and so that they are empowered to make the best decisions in their own cases.  If they do not understand what's going on and why it's taking so long, then I have not done my job.

I think that crime shows contribute to some misunderstandings about the criminal justice system. TV shows tend to oversimplify most of the boring procedural issues so that a complicated, convoluted process fits neatly into a 30-minute time slot.

In today's post, I want to break down the timeline of a typical misdemeanor investigation and prosecution.  Keep in mind, this is typical misdemeanor -- complicated misdemeanors can take longer, and felonies can take even longer than that.

• Day 1:  The incident and arrest  

To make matters simple, let's say you are arrested on suspicion of DUI on New Year's Day, January 1.  You'll probably be taken to jail for the night and released in the morning.  When you are released, the police will assign a court date, usually about 8-12 weeks in the future.  In this case, you might be ordered to appear in court around March or April.

• Day 2 - 60:  The investigation

Between the time of your arrest and your first court date, police will compile reports about the incident.  They will gather all of the relevant evidence and they will forward their findings to the local prosecutor (Note: most misdemeanor prosecutions are conducted by the District Attorney for your county.  They may also be conducted by the local City Attorney, though.  For the sake of simplicity, I will use "DA" and "prosecutor" interchangeably).  Some law enforcement agencies move much faster than others.  The CHP and the Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, for example, move notoriously slowly in their investigations.

• Around Day 60:  The filing of criminal charges

After the prosecutor receives all the reports from the arresting agency, they will make a decision regarding the filing of criminal charges.  Remember, the police do not "file charges", they only investigate crimes and forward their findings to the prosecutor.  Also keep in mind that victims of crimes do not "file charges" either.  Police may ask the victim if he or wishes to file charges, and the DA may take the victim's wishes into consideration, but the ultimate decision of whether or not to pursue a criminal case rests with the prosecutor alone.  The DA ultimately decides what charges, if any, to file.  Similarly, police and victims may not simply decide to "dismiss" a case (since they aren't the ones who filed it in the first place).

In most cases, prosecutors will review the police reports and file their case against you before the date when you were ordered to appear in court.  It's very common, though, for delays to occur at this stage.  You might show up in court on the appointed day and find that your name is not on the calendar.  Maybe the DA had questions after reading the police report and they sent the case back to the arresting agency for a more thorough investigation.  Or maybe the police did not forward their reports to the DA as quickly as they had anticipated.  Or maybe you're just a low priority and your paperwork is still buried under a pile of other cases at the DA's office.  Whatever the reason for the delay, you're left playing the waiting game.  This does NOT mean that you're "out of the woods", or that the charges have been dismissed.  It just means that your case hasn't been filed yet.  In California, prosecutors have up to one year from the date of the incident to file most misdemeanors.  You will be notified by mail when they eventually get around to filing your matter.

• Day 60-90:  Arraignment

For the sake of keeping things simple, let's assume that the police sent their reports to the prosecutor in a timely manner, the DA has reviewed all of the evidence, and they have filed misdemeanor charges against you by the time you appear in court.

The first court appearance is called the "arraignment".  At the arraignment, prosecutors will officially notify you of the charges that you are facing.  Copies of the police reports will be provided to your attorney.  You can either plead "guilty" and resolve your case on the spot, or you can plead "not guilty" and begin the process of fighting your case.

Remember, the arraignment is NOT the time to present your defense.  The court will not hear evidence, argument or witnesses at this hearing.  The arresting officer will not be present.  The arraignment is merely a formality where some preliminary information is exchanged between the lawyers.  This is one area that generates a lot of confusion with some defendants.  As I mentioned above, though, it's my job to clear up any misconceptions so that my clients know what to expect.

Often, defendants want to be heard at the arraignment.  If they can just explain the big misunderstanding, the DA or the judge will immediately throw the case out (they believe).  This impulse is understandable, especially when defendants truly believe that they are innocent of the charges.  As I said, though, this is not the time or the place for argument.  You will have an opportunity to present evidence in your own defense, but not at the arraignment stage.  

• Day 120, 150, 180, etc.:  Pretrial Conferences 

If you decide to plead "not guilty" and to start the process of fighting your case, then the attorneys will schedule a "pretrial conference" approximately 30-45 days after the arraignment, depending on the court's availability.  At the pretrial conference, attorneys will exchange more evidence and they will start to discuss various options to resolve the case.  The DA might have an offer for the defense attorney to present to his client.  The defense attorney might have a counter-offer that the prosecutor needs to discuss with his supervisors.  Your attorney might explain to the DA that the case is weak or that you have some valid defense.  He might also request copies of "supplemental discovery" -- video / audio recordings that are described in the police reports, etc.

This is also the stage where your defense attorney might file motions to dismiss the case for a variety of reasons.  If your lawyer believes that police or the DA has done something improperly during the course of the investigation or the prosecution, there may be valid grounds to ask a judge to exclude evidence or to throw the case out completely.  

Since attorneys are still exchanging evidence, offers and counter-offers at this point, it is common to conduct several pretrial conferences, usually spaced about 30-45 days apart.  Again, this area generates some misunderstanding with clients.  "It's been 4 months and the case still isn't resolved?  What's going on?", they ask.  And again, it's my job as an attorney to keep my clients informed of what I'm working on.  

Eventually, your defense attorney and the DA might reach an agreement.  Either the case is weak and it must be dismissed or reduced, or the case is strong and you should accept a generous plea deal while a good offer is still on the table.

• Day 210+: Trial

If the attorneys cannot make a deal, or if the defendant is not willing to accept an offer, then the case may eventually head to trial.  This is finally your opportunity to present evidence and argument in open court.  

Misdemeanor trials usually last about a week, including the time it takes to select a jury and for the jury to deliberate on their verdict after the evidence has been heard.  

As you can see, it is common for simple misdemeanor cases to last 6 months or more before they are resolved, assuming that there are no delays in the investigation or in filing the initial case.  

Since prosecutors have up to a year from the date of the offense to file most misdemeanor charges, cases may take even longer when the DA or the court is backlogged.  

The take-away is that misdemeanor prosecutions can be a marathon.  They're often longer and more complicated than many defendants expect.  Even when you're 100% innocent, don't expect the case to be resolved with a couple phone calls or a quick meeting with the DA.  

While the case is pending, though, you should feel free to communicate with your attorney so that you understand what he or she is working on.  If your lawyer is not available to speak with you and to provide you with regular updates, get a new lawyer.  Answering phone calls and communicating with clients should be the easiest part of the job.  If your lawyer can't do that properly, then he isn't doing what you hired him to do.  

If you or a loved one has questions about a misdemeanor case, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.  

Thanks for reading.  

Orange County Criminal Defense Attorney

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs in Orange County

Everyone knows that it's illegal to drive a car while you are impaired by alcohol.  The legal blood-alcohol limit, 0.08%, is one of those numbers we can all cite off the top of our heads, like 3.14 or 867-5309.  Unfortunately for a lot of my clients, though, the rules about driving under the influence of drugs are still a mystery.  I'll do my best to break it all down in today's blog post.

There's a lot of overlap in the way that courts handle "driving under the influence of alcohol" cases and cases where defendants are accused of driving under the influence of drugs.  There are also enough differences, though, that I thought the subject deserved a post.

Drunk Driving (DUI)

Section 23152 of the California Vehicle Code defines various "DUI" crimes.  VC 23152(a), for instance, says that it is illegal for anyone to operate a vehicle while he or she is "under the influence of alcohol", regardless of the person's actual blood-alcohol concentration.  To be convicted under this section, the DA does NOT need to prove that your blood-alcohol concentration was above the legal limit of 0.08%.  Prosecutors only need to prove that you were "impaired" due to alcohol, and that you could not operate a vehicle with the skill and care of an ordinary, sober person (whatever that means).  To make their case against you, the DA will introduce evidence that you had been observed driving badly, you "appeared disoriented" after the traffic stop, and you performed poorly on field sobriety tests, etc.

VC 23152(b), on the other hand, specifically prohibits anyone from driving a motor vehicle while his or her BAC is greater than 0.08%, regardless of whether or not that person is actually "impaired" by alcohol.  Even if you can "hold your liquor" and you perfectly nail all of the field sobriety tests like a champion, you can still be convicted of violating VC 23152(b) if a chemical test determines that your blood alcohol concentration is above the legal limit of 0.08%.

Starting on July 1, 2018, it will become illegal for anyone who has a BAC of 0.04% or greater to drive a car while a "passenger for hire" is present in the vehicle.  VC 23152(e) includes a definition of "passenger for hire" that makes it clear that this section applies to Uber and Lyft drivers who have a few pops on the clock, but who might still be below the legal limit of 0.08% that applies to other motorists.

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs (DUID)

This is where is gets really interesting. VC 23152(f) makes it illegal for anyone to drive a car while he or she is "under the influence of ANY drug".  "Any drug" means exactly that.  If the DA can prove that you were dangerously impaired by some substance, it is not a defense to argue that the drug was prescribed by your doctor (like Ambien), or that the drug is legal in California (like marijuana).

DUID cases, then, usually turn on a couple of obvious questions: how impaired is too impaired to drive?  And how convincingly can prosecutors prove this driver's exact degree of impairment?  Typically, police officers will testify about their objective observations (swerving, speeding, driving too slowly, etc.).  A certified "Drug Recognition Expert" ("DRE") will also tell the jury that he observed your pupils, your heart rate, your performance on cognitive test, etc., and that he formed the opinion that you were under the influence of some drug or combination of drugs.  A toxicologist from the crime lab will explain how your blood was drawn, stored and tested.  The toxicologist's reports will outline the substances that were found in your blood.  Based on the totality of all these observations from state-appointed "experts", the DA will attempt to convince a jury that you were dangerously impaired by drugs at the time of driving.

Even if the DA can prove that you were on drugs, that's not the end of the story -- and it doesn't necessarily mean that you're guilty of a crime.  In addition to proving that you had consumed drugs before driving, the DA must also prove that those drugs actually made you unsafe behind the wheel.  Of course, some prescription drugs might have the effect of making a driver more attentive or capable behind the wheel when those drugs are used in therapeutic doses under a doctor's supervision.  Some of those same substances might make a driver completely unsafe if they are abused, mixed with other drugs, or if a patient has an adverse reaction.  Adderall, for instance, is essentially an amphetamine.  When used properly, the drug performs wonders for individuals who suffer from ADD.  When abused, though, Adderall is addictive and dangerous.  If a defendant is accused of driving under the influence of Adderall (or Xanax, or Vicodin, etc.), his defense attorney might demonstrate to the jury that the levels of the drug found in his blood stream are within a "therapeutic range", where the driver is actually safer than if he would have been if he hadn't taken his meds that morning.

Allegations of driving under the influence of marijuana are even more complicated, since the drug may affect individual users differently.  Marijuana toxicology reports are especially strange.  Marijuana blood tests typically identify levels of both active delta-9 THC (the chemical that is currently causing impairment in the user, and THC metabolites, sometimes called "carboxy THC", or "COOH-THC". COOH-THC is a chemical that is produced within the body after the user has already metabolized whatever he or she previously smoked.  COOH-THC is not psychoactive.  It remains detectable in the user's blood stream for weeks after his or her most recent use, but it does not indicate that user's current level of impairment.  Delta-9 THC and COOH-THC should not be confused with each other.  Even high levels of COOH-THC are absolutely irrelevant in determining whether or not a suspect is too high to drive.  High levels of COOH-THC may be relevant, however, to prove that the defendant is a regular user and, thus, has a high tolerance to the drug.

In most of the cases I've handled where my clients are accused of driving under the influence of drugs, the DA's strongest piece of evidence is my client's own statement to police.  They admit that they "smoke a little", or a that they took some prescription drugs.  Statements like those can turn a minor traffic stop into a major arrest.  Without a confession, police might not have even suspected drug use.  Even if the officer had believed that the suspect was under the influence of drugs, there might not have been enough evidence to make an arrest or to sustain a conviction.  By talking to cops, though, suspects can make the DA's job very easy.

The Orange County District Attorney's Office has decided to make a priority out of aggressively prosecuting DUID cases.  Their agency actually receives grants from various highway safety groups to specifically target these offenses.  Those grants are used to hire teams of prosecutors who exclusively handle DUID charges.  The Orange Bubble is a bad place to be arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs.  Local prosecutors like to play hardball with these cases, but that doesn't mean that they have an advantage in court.  In fact, their aggressive attitude toward DUID often means that they choose to pursue weak cases, where the evidence just doesn't support a conviction.

Fullerton is especially a DUI / DUID enforcement hot spot.  The crowds of out-of-towners and college students who fill the bars and clubs between Commonwealth and Wilshire fuel a steady stream of DUI arrests every weekend.  All Fullerton Police officers are actually instructed to swarm the downtown area around closing time, unless they are responding to some other pressing matter.  They are also specifically trained to watch for drivers who are impaired by drugs and / or alcohol.  Fullerton police have reportedly been using a controversial new saliva test that can instantly test drivers for the presence of marijuana.  And just like the OCDA, the Fullerton Police Department receives grant money for traffic safety, which they use for DUI enforcement (which generates more money...).

If you or a loved one has questions about driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, call us for a free attorney consultation.  714 449 3335. Ask for John.  Our local staff has extensive experience defending against all types of DUI / DUID charges in Orange County.

Thanks for reading.

Fullerton DUI / DUID Lawyer

How to Fight a Restraining Order When the Facts are BAD

I've previously written on this blog about the process of getting or fighting a restraining order in California.  If you haven't already, take a moment to read some of the basics here.  In these introductory articles, I explain the legal procedures and the issues you should be prepared to discuss at your hearing.

I've also previously written on this blog about a common situation -- fighting a restraining order when the petitioner is crazy.  Defending yourself against a crazy person requires a special strategy, and that's not the focus of this article.

Today's post is specifically about fighting a restraining order when the facts against you are BAD.  Maybe you've said or done things that you're not proud of, and maybe the petitioner has proof (emails, text messages, surveillance videos, reliable witnesses, etc.).  Even if you've behaved badly, and even if we all agree on what happened, it's not necessarily a slam dunk that the petitioner will walk out of court with a restraining order in hand.  There are several effective strategies for fighting restraining orders, even if the facts appear bad at first glance.

There are situations where it may be futile to deny your bad behavior.  If the petitioner has reliable proof, you will harm your own case by disingenuously trying to deny the facts.  You will look like a liar, you will lose your credibility, and you will lose your case.  Of course, that's not to say that you should admit to things you haven't done or confess when the evidence is weak.  I'm speaking specifically about situations where you behaved badly and the petitioner can prove it.

Bad facts must be justified, excused or explained.  A justification is a defense where you essentially argue that you did the RIGHT thing under the circumstances.  Your behavior might have been illegal or improper in other situations, but perfectly proper in that particular place and time.  "Self defense" or "defense of others" are common justifications.  In most situations, for example, it is illegal to threaten someone with a weapon.  If you threaten your neighbor with a bat to make him stop beating his wife, though, you've done a GOOD thing.  If your neighbor then files a restraining order against you for threatening him with a bat, you should admit that you engaged in that conduct (you DID threaten him with a bat), and you should explain to the judge why your actions were justified under the circumstances.

If you can't justify your actions, maybe you can excuse them. An excuse is a defense where you acknowledge that your behavior wasn't "good", but you argue that you don't deserve to accept the blame.  If, for example, you were involuntarily drugged, you might not deserve to be punished for your behavior while you were under the influence.

If your behavior can't be justified or excused, maybe it can at least be explained.  An explanation is a defense where you admit that you did the wrong thing, but you argue that your blame is mitigated or reduced under the circumstances.  For example, maybe you were provoked with offensive insults and you responded with violence.  We don't agree that your violent reaction was appropriate, but maybe we understand why you reacted the way you did.  Your outburst was out-of-character and it won't happen again.

That last part is important -- it won't happen again.  As I've previously explained on this blog, a restraining order is an "injunction".  An injunction is a court order that is intended to prevent some future harm that has not yet happened, not to punish you for some past wrongdoing.  This is tricky.  The issue that the judge must decide at the restraining order hearing is: has the petitioner proven that the respondent has harassed him or her?  Sometimes -- and this is risky -- we must acknowledge that the respondent has committed some act of violence, threats or harassment against the petitioner, but we establish that the harm is not likely to reoccur in the future.  Since we're talking about an injunction and not a criminal violation, the analysis doesn't stop with, "did this happen?".  A restraining order is not appropriate unless the harm is likely to happen in the future.  If the harm has already passed and is not likely to happen again, then a restraining order is not appropriate.  There is valid case law to support this defense, but the proper citations and legal argument must be presented effectively by an experienced, competent lawyer.  Don't try this at home.

If you or a loved one has questions about a restraining order in California, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County Restraining Order Lawyer

What We're Working On Now

It's been a busy couple of months here in the office, and I realize that I haven't posted any updates about some of our recent success stories.  If you've been anxiously holding your breath, good news!  Here's a quick rundown of some of the great cases that we've been working on:

• Driving Without a License / False Info to a Police Officer -- Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County):  Our client had been stopped several years ago for driving without a valid license.  To make matters worse, he gave a false name to the officer.  A month later, police discovered that the name was incorrect and our client was accused of 2 separate misdemeanors. Our client failed to appear in court and he had 2 outstanding warrants for several years. Eventually, the warrants caught up to him and he was going to lose his job. This morning, I met with the DA and they agreed to dismiss both matters entirely. Our client can finally get back to work without being afraid that police would show up at any minute and take him into custody on some ticky tacky old warrants. Greats news for him and his family. 
• Elder Abuse Restraining Order -- Santa Ana (Orange County):  Our client was an elderly man who had been the victim of harassment and financial abuse by his adult daughter. He was seeking a restraining order against her to keep her away from his home and bank accounts. We were able to negotiate an out-of-court stipulation to help both parties achieve what they wanted without going to a full hearing before a judge. As I've written on this blog in the past, stipulations can be a great way for parties to negotiate their disputes in restraining order matters without involving taxpayers and judges. Out-of-court negotiations often allow both parties to achieve 100% of their goals without the risk that a judge will impose some "solution" where neither party is satisfied. 
• Attempted Rape --  Fullerton (Orange County):  Our client is a young alcoholic. He was extremely intoxicated and acting belligerently, including some aggressive behavior toward a female stranger. We all agreed that his behavior was inappropriate, but I did not believe that he intended or attempted to "rape" anyone. After a thorough investigation, the District Attorney agreed that my client was not guilty of attempted rape. He was potentially facing several years in prison, followed by lifetime sex offender registration. Instead, he received the appropriate resolution: mandatory alcohol counseling and NO sex offender registration.  
• Trespassing / Theft -- Fullerton (Orange County):  Our client was a "porch pirate". She was actually captured on camera stealing packages from the victim's doorstep. Package theft is rampant in North Orange County, so police and prosecutors are often eager to make an example when offenders are caught red-handed. Luckily, our client was sympathetic and apologetic. She had no serious criminal history. Most importantly, she had a great defense attorney! In the end, she agreed to a "diversion deal" -- she took a 6-hour class one Saturday and the DA agreed to dismiss the case entirely.  
• Child Abuse -- West Covina (Los Angeles County):  Our client was accused of abusing her boyfriend's child. My client insisted that she had merely used some reasonable methods of discipline to correct behavior in an obstinate child. The defendant was a tough disciplinarian, but I did not believe that the punishments she imposed on the child were excessive or unwarranted. After some further investigation, the DA agreed to dismiss the charges.

These are just a few of the cases where we've recently achieved some great results for our clients. Obviously, the facts of every case are different, so these success stories are not guarantees or predictions of future performance.  

I have a lot more interesting cases that I'll be free to discuss soon. Check back for updates as they become available.  

If you or a loved one is accused of a crime in Orange County, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. 

Fullerton Criminal Defense Attorney

What is the Statute of Limitations for Sex Crimes in California?

The "statute of limitations" ("SoL") describes the time limit within which prosecutors must bring criminal charges.  If the DA waits too long before filing a case, they may be "time barred" from doing so.  Like everything else in the law, though, this is often more complicated than it sounds.

Before we get started, it's important to remember that the "statute of limitations" refers to the time within which the case must be filed.  Often, prosecutors do file a case within the proscribed time period, but the defendant never appears in court for his arraignment.  When this happens, a bench warrant is issued.  The warrant may remain outstanding forever, or until the defendant is eventually arrested and brought to court.  A warrant will never simply go away on its own.  If an old warrant has been outstanding for several years, the defendant may have a valid argument that his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, but this is different from a "statute of limitations" argument if the case was filed before the SoL expired.

The length of the statute of limitations depends on the maximum sentence for the specific underlying crime.  For most misdemeanors, the SoL is one  year.  That means prosecutors have one year from the date that the crime was discovered (not necessarily the date that the crime was committed) to file charges.  If the crime is a "wobbler" (one that can be filed as either a misdemeanor or a felony at the discretion of the DA), then a longer statute of limitations may apply, even if the case is only filed as a misdemeanor.

If the crime is a felony and the maximum penalty is less than 8 years in prison, the statute of limitations is usually 3 years.  If the maximum sentence is more than 8 years in prison, then the SoL is usually 6 years.  If the crime is potentially punishable by death or by life in prison, or if the crime involves embezzlement of public money, then there is no statute of limitations -- the DA can file charges at any time.

There are many, many exceptions and caveats to the rule that prosecutions must generally commence with within the 1-, 3- or 6-year statute of limitations.  If, for example, a defendant is out of the state when the crime is committed, the SoL can be extended by up to 3 additional years.

Arguments about the statute of limitations get especially complicated in cases involving allegations of child molestation, or "lewd acts with a minor" (PC 288).  Under section 803(f) of the California Penal Code, the SoL may be extended even longer under certain circumstances. The  district attorney can file criminal charges at any time (for up to one year after a report is made) if ALL of the following criteria are met:

• The crime involved child rape, oral copulation, penetration, or other "substantial sexual conduct" with a minor (the victim was under 18 at the time),
• The crime had never been previously reported to police, AND
• There is some independent evidence to support the allegations.  If the victim is over 21 at the time that the crime is reported, that "independent evidence" must be "clear and convincing".

The argument in these cases tends to revolve around the 3rd prong -- that the allegation be supported by "independent evidence" that is "clear and convincing".  Appellate courts have dealt with these issues extensively, and the nuances are intricate.

As I warned in the opening paragraph, issues regarding the statute of limitations can get complicated.  You may have a valid defense based on a filing delay, but the argument must be properly presented and supported by up-to-date citations or it will not be effective.

If you or a loved one is fighting an old sex case, call us for a free attorney consultation. 714 449 3335.  Ask for John. 

Thanks for reading.

Fullerton Criminal Defense Attorney

What are the Rules About Marijuana and Driving in California?

Section 23152 of the California Vehicle Code says that driving under the influence of drugs and / or alcohol is a misdemeanor.  Everyone knows that legal limit for alcohol is 0.08% -- if prosecutors can prove that your blood alcohol concentration was greater than 0.08% at the time of driving, you are guilty of DUI.

Marijuana is a lot more complicated than alcohol, though.  Even though adults over 21 may now legally grow, use and possess marijuana in California, it is still illegal to operate any motor vehicle (a car, a boat, a golf cart, a jet ski, a moped...anything with a motor) while you are "impaired" by cannabis.

Unlike alcohol, there is no magic number to objectively determine whether or not someone is too stoned to legally drive.  To convict you of driving under the influence of marijuana, the prosecutor must prove that you operated a vehicle while you were in such a condition that you could not exercise the skill and care of an ordinary, sober driver (whatever that means).

If you are stopped by police and an officer suspects that you've been smoking, he will begin the standard investigative procedures: he will ask you a series of questions about where you're coming from and where you're going.  He'll ask if you're under the care of a doctor of if you've had any recent surgeries.  He'll ask when you slept last and whether or not there is anything mechanically wrong with your car.  The officer also will probably invite you to participate in a series of field sobriety tests (walk a line, touch your nose, stand on one foot, estimate 30 seconds, etc.).  You are not legally required to take these tests.  You'll be arrested either way, so I'd advise that you provide as little evidence as possible to be used against you later in court.  If you are stopped on suspicion of DUI, you should POLITELY decline to play the roadside Olympics.  You should also avoid talking yourself into trouble.  Do not admit that you recently smoked, drank, or consumed any controlled substance. 

After you are arrested, you must provide a blood sample.  If you refuse to submit to a chemical test after you have been lawfully arrested on suspicion of DUI, the DMV will automatically suspend your driver's license for one year. 

To make their case against you in court, the DA will introduce evidence that were driving poorly before you were pulled over.  A police officer will testify that he stopped you because you were driving too slowly, you were drifting within your lane, you made an unsafe lane change, etc.  The officer will testify that you "appeared disoriented" and "had difficulty following instructions".  He will probably also testify about the smell of burnt cannabis emitted from your breath and from the interior of your vehicle.  If you agreed to perform field sobriety tests, the officer will testify that you failed them all miserably, even if you feel like you nailed them.  Based on the totality of his observations, the officer will testify, he formed the opinion that you were dangerously impaired by marijuana and that you could not safely operate a vehicle.

The DA will also use your blood test results to build their case against you.  Your blood test will give two important numbers: your levels THC metabolites (also called "carboxy-THC", or "COOH-THC"), and your levels of active THC (also called "delta-9-THC").  THC metabolites remain in your blood system for weeks after your last usage.  They are not psychoactive and are not indicative of current impairment.  They only prove that you have consumed marijuana some time within the past several weeks.  This number is not relevant to determining whether or not you were dangerously impaired at the time of driving, but it may be relevant to demonstrate that you have a high tolerance for the drug.

Your delta-9-THC numbers are slightly more valuable in determining your current level of impairment.  Delta-9-THC is the chemical that is CURRENTLY active in your bloodstream.  Your delta-9-THC concentration is still not a completely reliable way to determine a driver's degree of impairment, though.  Since cannabis affects users so differently, there is not a strong correlation between a person's delta-9-THC levels and his or her actual impairment.  A relatively inexperienced marijuana user might be very impaired at a low THC level, where a more experienced smoker might barely feel any effect at the high blood-THC concentration.  Consider also that indica-dominant strains might affect a user differently than sativa-dominant strains, and that standard field sobriety tests are designed to detect alcohol impairment, not cannabis impairment.  Most "experts" will testify that a driver is more likely to be involved in a collision when his or her active THC level is greater than 5 ng/ml, and that the risk is multiplied by the presence of alcohol, but this is controversial.

Police and prosecutors are aggressively working to crack down on "drugged driving", including driving under the influence of legal drugs (marijuana, prescription drugs, sleep aids, etc.).  The Orange County District Attorney's Office has several deputy prosecutors who are specially trained and specifically assigned to process DUID cases full-time.  They take these cases seriously, but that doesn't mean that they have the advantage.  In my experience, their aggressive policy often means that they choose to pursue cases even when the evidence is weak. 

If you or a loved one has questions about DUI or driving under the influence of drugs in Southern California, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Fullerton DUI Lawyer

How to Apply for a California Cannabis License

California began issuing licenses to the cannabis industry on Monday, January 1, 2018.  Specific state-issued licenses now govern virtually every aspect of the cannabis market, from seed to consumption, including cultivation, manufacture of concentrates, transportation, distribution, operation of testing labs, and retail sales.

If you're interested in getting involved with California's legal cannabis industry, the first step is to decide on a specific product or service you plan to offer.  As mentioned above, each stage of production and distribution will require its own specific license.  There are restrictions on how many different types of licenses any person or entity can control, and how many different licensees may operate on a single lot or parcel of land.  If you want to grow cannabis indoors on a lot smaller than 500 square feet, there is a specific license for that.  If you want to grow outdoors on a lot larger than 10,000 square feet but smaller than an acre, there is a specific license for that, too.

Once you settle on a specific product or service that you plan to offer, you'll need to form a business plan, including your ownership structure and financing.  Unlike our old medical marijuana rules, California now allows marijuana businesses to operate on a for-profit basis, rather than limiting them to non-profit mutual benefit corporations.  For the first time, you may choose to operate a canna-business as a sole proprietorship, an LLC, a partnership or a corporation.  The ownership / financing structure that you choose may have significant implications for your license application.  For example, you may be required to disclose personal details of your financial interest holders, and individuals with serious criminal convictions may be disqualified from holding more than a 20% interest in some marijuana businesses.

The next major hurdle in the application process will be finding a local jurisdiction (a city or an unincorporated part of a county) that actually authorizes your commercial cannabis activity.  The state will not process any applications without a copy of a valid local license, permit or other authorization from the jurisdiction where the business plans to operate.  As of today, very few municipalities in Southern California permit new cannabis-related businesses to open their doors.  Some towns have lax enforcement, some allow a handful of grandfathered locations, and some lack the resources to shut down the illegal dispensaries and grow houses that operate in violation of local ordinances.  If you want to apply for a state license, though, you'll need explicit local approval from your jurisdiction.  Before than can happen, more cities in Southern California will have to update their zoning laws to permit these types of businesses.

Once you have approval from your local city, then we can complete the application process according to the regulations that will govern your specific niche of the industry.  This may include obtaining permits from the California State Water Resources Control Board, applying for a seller's permit, registering as an employer with the Employment Development Department, posting surety bonds, negotiating a labor agreement, etc.

As I see it, the biggest impediment to starting a new canna-business in Southern California is the lack of local jurisdictions that expressly authorize them to operate.  You can't start running your business until you have a valid state license, and you can't get a state license until you have approval from your city, and no almost no city in Southern California will approve you (as of today).  There have been a lot of rumors about which jurisdiction might be the next to revamp their land use regulations, but very little action from city councils and planning commissions.

If you're serious about forming a marijuana-related business in Southern California, I would encourage you to speak with your local representatives on the city council and your local planning commission.  Attend public hearings and comment sessions.  Write letters, circulate petitions, support candidates who will promote commonsense reforms and oppose the dinosaurs who still believe in "reefer madness" ("But won't somebody think of the children?", "Not in my backyard!").

If you have questions about getting involved with California's legal cannabis industry, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County Cannabis Lawyer

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs in Orange County

The Orange County District Attorney is aggressively cracking down on cases involving driving under the influence of drugs (DUID).

There's a lot of bad information out there regarding DUID cases in California.  Some of my clients are surprised to learn that they can be arrested for driving under the influence of any drug or combination of drugs that affect their ability to drive a car safely.  That includes legal drugs, illegal drugs, prescription drugs, medical marijuana, chemotherapy drugs, sleep aids, even NyQuil.

Everyone knows that the "magic number" with alcohol is 0.08%.  If you drive a car while your blood alcohol concentration is 0.08% or greater, you are guilty of DUI.  With other drugs, though, there is no clearly defined limit in California that tells us how "impaired" is too impaired to drive.  To be guilty of driving under the influence of drugs, prosecutors must prove that you were intoxicated to such a degree that you could not operate a vehicle with the skill and care of a normal, sober driver.  That can be complicated.

If you are arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, you will be given the choice of either submitting to a blood test or a breath test.  If officers suspect that you are impaired by drugs, though, you must give a blood sample (a breath test will not detect drugs other than alcohol).  The Orange County Crime Lab will screen your blood sample for 5 drugs: alcohol, THC (both active delta-9 THC and its metabolites), opiates, cocaine, amphetamine and benzodiazepines (prescription drugs like Xanax).  The presence of one or more of these drugs, though, does not necessarily prove that you are dangerously impaired or guilty of a DUI.  Many drugs have a safe, therapeutic application. Someone who suffers from ADD, for example, might be a safer, more attentive driver after he takes his Adderall.  The fact that he tests positive for amphetamine, then, does not prove that he is dangerously impaired by drugs.

Marijuana is an especially tricky one.  Most people have heard that THC is detectable in the blood for weeks after use.  This is only partly true.  When you smoke weed, delta-9 THC is the chemical that actually causes you to feel "high".  After you consume delta-9 THC, your body metabolizes the drug and produces a chemical called "carboxy THC" (COOH-THC).  Carboxy THC has no psychoactive effect, but it may remain traceable for days or weeks.  Carboxy THC, then, may be evidence of recent marijuana use, but it means nothing if we're trying to determine whether or not a subject is impaired at the moment.  When the crime lab analyzes your blood sample, their report will show your levels of both delta-9 THC (the stuff that is currently making you high), and COOH-THC (evidence of past use).  In some cases, high levels of COOH-THC can actually support your defense.  If you are an experienced user, you might have a high tolerance for the drug.  In that case, even high levels of active delta-9 THC might not necessarily prove that you were dangerously stoned at the time of driving.

If you or a loved one has questions about driving under the influence of drugs in Orange County, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County DUI Lawyer

Religious Use of Marijuana

There is a pervasive and persistent myth that, somehow, claiming "religious use" is a valid, legal defense to the charge of operating an unlicensed marijuana dispensary.  It is not.

It's frustrating to see decent people taking bad advice and getting themselves arrested.  It's especially frustrating in a place like California, where marijuana is legal.  California currently allows adults to cultivate and possess marijuana for recreational or medical use.  If you follow some simple rules, you can even sell it.  Unfortunately, some shady attorneys, charlatans and various non-attorney posers have been spreading the myth that "rules don't apply to you if you simply pretend that it's your religion."  This is, of course, total nonsense.  As a real attorney, I would strongly discourage anyone from relying on this argument.

Just think about it.  If anyone could successfully disregard the law by simply claiming that XYZ was part of their "religion", what would stop them from founding the Church of Child Pornography?  Or the Church of Bank Robbery?  

Most of the confusion revolves around a pair of federal laws -- the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Religious Land Use and Incarcerated Persons Act.  These laws prohibit the federal government from taking any action that "substantially burdens" the free exercise of religion unless authorities can show some compelling interest in doing so.  The RLUIPA further prohibits local authorities from imposing land use restrictions that interfere with the free exercise of religion.  Some advocates have argued that, taken together, these federal laws provide carte blanche to ignore local zoning laws regarding commercial marijuana activity as long as they call their dispensary a "church".

Courts have consistently shot these arguments down.  Instead, they have affirmed the power of local zoning authorities to regulate commercial marijuana activity, regardless of whether or not litigants claim that cannabis is a "sacrament".  Their reasoning has turned on a couple key points.  Keep in the mind that no court has ever ruled that religion is an absolute defense to anything.  The state can always "interfere with the practice of religion" if the regulation is narrowly tailored to address some compelling government interest.  

In Mooney v. Lynch (2016), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied a challenge from the Oklevueha Native American Church.  In that case, a "church" sued the federal government, claiming that laws against marijuana interfered with the free exercise of their religion.  Judges disagreed because, "nothing in the record demonstrated that a prohibition on cannabis forced the plaintiffs to choose between obedience to their religion and criminal sanction, such that they were being coerced to act contrary to their religious beliefs."

To date, nobody has ever convinced a federal judge that laws against selling marijuana actually impose a "substantial burden" on the free exercise of their religion.  There have been a handful of cases in which Native American churches have won lawsuits against the federal government, but those cases turned on technical, procedural issues.  The courts did not actually determine that Native American religious practices trump federal drug laws, and the rulings do not affect other litigants who were not parties to those cases.

As I mentioned above, though, there are legal ways to grow, use and sell marijuana in California -- but claiming that cannabis is a "sacrament" is not your best strategy.  If you or a loved one has questions about forming a legal marijuana farm or dispensary in Southern California, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Fullerton Marijuana Lawyer

I Lost in Restraining Order Court. Can I Get Another Hearing?

You generally get one bite of the apple in restraining order court. This is why I'm always stressing the importance of showing up to court prepared for your hearing. Part of effectively preparing for your day before the judge includes speaking with a qualified, local attorney as early as possible. Your attorney understands the rules of evidence, how to issue subpoenas, how to properly examine witnesses, and how to effectively present a case in court. You wouldn't operate on yourself; don't try to represent yourself in court.

If, despite your best efforts, you haven't had an opportunity to thoroughly prepare before your court hearing, there's some good news -- you are entitled to at least one free continuance. Maybe you haven't been able to save up the money to retain a qualified lawyer. Maybe you're still trying to locate and interview prospective witnesses. If you need more time for any reason, all you have to do is show up and ask the judge nicely for 2-4 more weeks to get your ducks into a row. The court will give you as much time as you reasonably need to prepare your defense.

That being said, there are a handful of good reasons to request a new hearing if a restraining order is granted against you. First, though, you need to understand a few things that are NOT good reasons to request a new hearing:

I Wasn't Ready 

The court does NOT want to hear that you were simply unprepared. As mentioned above, you were entitled to a continuance before the hearing if you weren't ready to go forward. If you wanted more time, you only had to ask for it. If you announced that you were ready to litigate, though, it's too late to request a postponement now. That ship has sailed.

I'm Not a Lawyer

It is also NOT effective to argue that your hearing was unfair because you aren't a lawyer and you didn't understand the rules. If you choose to represent yourself in court, you will be held to the same standards as a professionally trained and licensed attorney. You will not receive any special considerations or preferential treatment if you appear without a lawyer.

The Petitioner Lied and the Judge Believed It

Finally, you CANNOT argue that the restraining order should be overturned because you disagree with the judge's ruling. Again, the point of the hearing was to present relevant facts and evidence -- that was your chance. If you showed up in court without any evidence and unprepared to explain / deny / excuse the petitioner's evidence, reread the previous paragraphs.

After hearing the evidence, the judge had discretion to determine whether or not harassment has occurred. If the judge heard the facts and weighed the evidence fairly, in accordance with the law, then the issues are settled. The court will not reconsider any new arguments, except...

Motion to Reconsider a Restraining Order

The Respondent MAY ask the court for a new hearing if there are some "new or different facts, circumstances or law" since the first hearing. If the situation has changed since you last appeared in court, you may appear before a judge and explain why the restraining order against you is no longer necessary or warranted.

In a motion to reconsider a restraining order, the judge does not want to hear a better version of the arguments you've already made. Instead, the court wants to hear something new that wasn't available at the last hearing.

Here's the kicker, though: a motion to reconsider a restraining order must be filed within 10 days after the respondent is served with the original order. This is why motions to reconsider are difficult -- you're required to prove some "change in circumstances", but you only have 10 days to do so. Since circumstances are unlikely to change that drastically in 10 days, motions to reconsider restraining orders can be an uphill battle.

If you or a loved one has questions about restraining orders in Southern California, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County Restraining Order Lawyer.

Is it Worth My Time to Fight a Restraining Order?

I believe I've posted about this question before, but I still hear it a few times every week. Callers tell me that an ex-girlfriend or a former co-worker has filed a restraining order petition against them. They don't see the petitioner anymore and they have no reason or desire to have further contact with that person. As they see it, a restraining order really wouldn't affect their life in any way -- it wouldn't prohibit them from doing anything that they really want to do. Why take the time and effort to fight it?

There are plenty of good reasons to oppose a restraining order, even if you agree to the petitioner's basic demands (e.g. stay away, have no contact, do not follow or stalk, etc.), and even if you have no interest in doing those things anyway. Having a restraining order issued against you will affect your life in ways that might not be obvious. These court orders are public records. Subjects of restraining orders forfeit various rights that the rest of us enjoy. Being the subject of a restraining order may also lead to some other nightmare scenarios that I've seen, and that I'll describe below.

Even if you're not interested in the restraining order, your employer might be. As mentioned, restraining orders are public records. They're available for anyone to see, with or without your permission. They are easily discovered by a simple background check. Most courts even put this information online now. Being the subject of a restraining order can make you ineligible to hold certain jobs or professional licenses. Good luck getting a security clearance or a Global Entry pass with an active restraining order against you.

Anyone who is the subject of a restraining order is prohibited from owning or possessing firearms. If there's a restraining order against you, you may not even have access to firearms that someone else in your home owns. If you already own guns, you will be ordered to surrender them to local police, or else sell them to a licensed dealer immediately. You may not simply give them or "sell" them to a friend or family member for safekeeping. If your job requires you to carry a weapon in the course of your duties, you might be looking for a new job. Again, good luck finding work with a restraining order on your record.

Having a restraining order issued against you may also make you vulnerable to false accusations or "accidental violations". If the petitioner spots you (or someone who looks like you) in a restaurant or a public place, she is likely to call the police. Even if you haven't "knowingly and willfully" violated the order, you can expect an unpleasant and embarrassing encounter with investigators. I've handled too many cases where my client accidentally butt-dialed an ex-girlfriend, allegedly violating an active restraining order. If your email gets hacked and your account starts sending spam messages to everyone in your address book, you could end up back in court trying to explain yourself.

Take restraining orders seriously, and make the necessary preparations to ensure the best outcome possible for your case. Of course, the best way to effectively prepare for your day in court is to retain a qualified, local expert. If you or a loved one has questions about restraining orders, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335. Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County Restraining Order Lawyer

How to Fight a Restraining Order When the Petitioner is Crazy

One of the inherent problems in restraining order court is that anybody can file a petition against anybody else, at any time.  This often means that the petitioner (the person seeking the protection of a restraining order), is crazy.  He or she may be paranoid, delusional, senile, drug-addled, vindictive, or just plain nuts.

If a crazy person is seeking a restraining order against you, presenting an effective defense can be tricky.  It is not sufficient to simply argue that the petitioner is crazy.  Instead, you must carefully show the judge that your opponent is detached from reality, and that the allegations against you are entirely made up.  The goal here is to prove that the accusations against you are false, not just to prove that the person making the accusations is erratic or afflicted with some mental disease.

This defense strategy can be more complicated and difficult than some people expect.  Even if you have personal knowledge of the petitioner's mental health problems, the rules of evidence will restrict the types of arguments that you're allowed to present in court.  First of all, you may not testify that somebody else told you about the petitioner's diagnosis.  That would be hearsay.  The person who actually made that diagnosis must appear in court to testify.  If that person is the petitioner's doctor, then the rules of confidentiality would prohibit the doctor from revealing the petitioner's medical records.

In some types of restraining order hearings, hearsay is admissible.  Even if this evidence may come in under the hearsay rules, it may still be excluded if you are not qualified to render an opinion on the subject.  Before any evidence is admissible in court, the witness must "lay the foundation" -- that is, you must prove that you possess the knowledge that you're now presenting as fact.  Psychiatric diagnoses are obviously complicated medical issues.  Even if you've personally observed "crazy" behavior by the petitioner, the judge will not allow you to express an opinion about the petitioner's medical condition or mental state because you're simply not qualified to do so.

Remember also that even crazy people have the right to be free from civil harassment and domestic violence.  If your defense is that the petitioner is crazy, you must be careful not to blame the victim for your harassment.  You must be extremely mindful not to argue that the petitioner deserves to be harassed because she is crazy.  Instead, you must argue that you have not harassed anybody.  If the petitioner believes that you have harassed her, you must prove that she is mistaken and that her false beliefs are rooted in delusions.  This is done by effectively cross-examining the witness in court.  A qualified attorney knows how to ask probing questions, drill down on the details, let the witness discuss her false beliefs, and give her enough rope to hang herself.  A lawyer who is experienced in the art of cross-examination will not argue with the witness or become confrontational.  Instead, the witness should have the opportunity to destroy her own credibility.

Last, and most important, is to always consider the relevance of any argument that you want to present.  The big question in restraining order court is always whether or not the petitioner can prove that the respondent has engaged in harassment or domestic violence.  The court is not interested in determining whether or not you're a good person, or whether the opposing party is a bad person, or whether someone has lied about something unrelated in the past, or who was responsible for the breakup, or even if one party suffers from a mental illness.  Those issues might be important to you, and they might be loosely related to something in your case, but the court simply does not care.  It might be tempting, but you must not waste the court's time and your own by focusing on details that are legally irrelevant.

Every piece of evidence that you present as the respondent must support the fact that you have not engaged in conduct that would legally justify the issuance of a restraining order.  If your argument is that the petitioner is crazy, you must prove that the allegations against you are untrue.  The petitioner's mental health issues are not an excuse for your bad behavior.  Instead, those delusions help explain why the petitioner falsely believes that you have done something inappropriate.

If you or a loved one has questions about restraining orders in California, call our office for a free attorney consultation.  714 449 3335.  Ask for John.

Thanks for reading.

Orange County Restraining Order Lawyer

Can I Get a DUI on Private Property?

In California, you can be arrested for DUI on private property, off-road, or even on the water.  

Section 23152 of the California Vehicle Code prohibits anybody from operating a vehicle while they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The DA doesn't need to prove that you were on a public road. They don't even need to prove that the vehicle was an automobile.  

I've had clients accused of riding dirt bikes, jet skis and golf carts while drunk (not all at the same time). In California, all of those situations can be treated as "DUI". Hiring an experienced DUI defense attorney can be very helpful in these cases, though. Often, the kind of officers who arrest drunken dirt bikers, boaters or golfers are inexperienced in making those types of arrests. They don't have the training or resources to properly prosecute DUI cases. Park rangers and harbor patrol officers might mishandle evidence or fail to file documents in a timely manner.

You can even be cited for riding a bicycle while drunk in California ("Cycling Under the Influence, or "CUI"), but those cases are treated a little differently. CUI is an infraction only and not a misdemeanor, so the court cannot impose jail time or probation. Bicycles obviously aren't "motor vehicles", so the 0.08% BAC limit doesn't apply, and the DMV will not suspend your driver's license or impose mandatory classes. To be guilty of CUI, the officer must prove that you were so impaired by alcohol and /or drugs that you could not operate a bicycle with the skill and care of an ordinary cyclist (whatever that means). If you are cited for CUI, you may demand a breath or blood test, but you are not required to take one.  

If you or a loved one has questions about DUI in California, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John. 

Fullerton DUI Lawyer

How Can I Drop Domestic Violence Charges?

Here's a situation that our office sees very frequently:  A couple (married, dating, etc.) has a big, blowup argument.  The police show up and one party accuses the other of domestic violence.  Someone spends the night in jail.  The police conduct an investigation and the DA files criminal charges against the party that they determine to be "the aggressor".

By the time the case ends up in court, emotions have cooled, the parties have attended some counseling and the "victim" no longer desires the involvement of the courts.  She asks prosecutors to drop the case, but they refuse.  Instead, the DA proceeds "full speed ahead", with or without cooperation from the reporting party / "victim". 

Many of my clients are surprised to learn that an alleged victim of domestic violence cannot simply "drop the charges" in California.  The decision of whether to file / drop criminal cases is made by the District Attorney's Office.  Prosecutors may consult with victims, but they're not legally required to follow a victim's wishes.  

When a victim asks to drop charges (or indicates that she will not cooperate in a prosecution), the DA must decide whether or not they believe that they have a strong case without their victim's testimony.  The evidence might include a recorded 911 call where the victim describes events as they're happening ("He's hitting me now! Help!").  The suspect might be heard in the background shouting threats.  The police might have recorded an interview with the victim near the time of the incident in which she discusses her injuries and how they occurred.  Cops might have photographed the injuries to corroborate the reporting party's story.  Maybe other witness tell police that they saw the suspect personally striking the victim, etc.  In those situations, prosecutors will aggressively follow through with a criminal prosecution even if the victim asks them to dismiss the case.  Their reasoning is easy to understand -- they can prove that the suspect has committed a serious, violent crime against the People of the State of California.  He shouldn't be allowed to intimidate his victim into recanting her story.  Prosecutors have a responsibility to protect vulnerable citizens and to seek justice against those who would do them harm.  Plus, they don't need the victim's testimony to win a conviction.  There's enough independent evidence to prove the charges even without her cooperation.  That much makes sense.  

Most cases aren't that cut and dry, though.  A fact pattern that I see more commonly goes like this: Both parties have been drinking or using drugs and arguing.  At some point, one party (or a neighbor, or a stranger) calls police to report something nebulous ("I think they're fighting or something.  I heard a loud noise", etc.).  When the police show up, one party or both accuses the other of domestic violence.  There are no injuries, witnesses or physical evidence to support the accusations, but cops take a report anyway.  By the time the case ends up in court, the accuser changes her story.  Maybe she admits that she exaggerated a little, or even that she was the aggressor.  In these situations, an ethical prosecutor should consider the interests of justice, the wishes of the parties, the cost to taxpayers, the burden to the court system, and their priorities in general.  When those considerations tilt in favor of dropping the case, they should do so. 

But these guys didn't get to be overpaid government employees by making reasonable decisions.  Often, prosecutors need a little arm-twisting to help them come to their senses.  That's where we step in.  Our professional staff can help dig you out of a hole without making the hole any deeper.  We have extensive experience defending against all types of domestic violence cases in Orange County, Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino.  We can deal directly with investigators, witnesses and prosecutors to ensure that your rights are protected.  Domestic violence charges may carry harsh, mandatory penalties.  They're complicated, emotional matters and they require the attention of an expert. 

If you or a loved one has questions about domestic violence, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.  Thanks for reading. 

Fullerton Domestic Violence Lawyer

Send an Offensive Text Message, Lose Your Gun Rights

Many of my clients are shocked to learn how quickly a rude or offensive text message can cost them their gun rights in California.  Don't make that mistake.  Before you hit "send", think about what you're willing to sacrifice.

California has a very permissive system of issuing restraining orders, especially in cases of alleged domestic violence -- and the definition of "domestic violence" in California is expansive.  The court will issue a restraining order when the petitioner can prove "by a preponderance of the evidence" (a very low burden) that the respondent has "harassed" him or her.  "Harassment" includes some behavior that we might not consider to be "abuse" or "domestic violence" within the conventional meanings of those terms.  Harassment in California includes any course of conduct, directed at a specific person, which serves no lawful purpose, and which would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress.

"Harassment" in restraining order hearings often includes rude, offensive or insulting text messages or emails.  Calling your ex-girlfriend a "bitch" in a text message may be the grounds for the court to slap you with domestic violence restraining order, even if you never hurt or threatened anyone.  In many cases, a judge may find that an insulting text message meets the definition of "harassment", described above.

A judge can also issue a domestic violence restraining order when one party has sent repeated, unwanted messages to an ex.  Depending on the circumstances, sending annoying text messages may constitute "harassment".  The messages don't even have to be rude or insulting. If your ex-girlfriend has asked you to stop calling or texting, you are legally obligated to respect her wishes.  If you continue sending her unwanted messages, she may take those screen shots to court and get a restraining order against you.

Anyone who is the subject of a restraining order in California must immediately surrender all their firearms to the local police, or else sell them to a licensed gun dealer.  You may not simply "sell" your collection to a friend or have a family member hold your weapons.  You also may not buy, possess or even have access to firearms while the restraining order is in effect.  If you're a hunter, collector or target shooter, you may be legally barred from enjoying your hobbies for up to 5 years.

The laws and procedures regarding restraining orders in California are complicated. If you or a loved one has questions about the process, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.

Orange County Restraining Orders

Can You Be Arrested for DUI if Your Blood Alcohol Level is Below 0.08%?

Many drivers are surprised to learn that they can be arrested for DUI in California even if their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is below the legal limit of 0.08%.

In California, "DUI" is actually several distinct crimes: 1) driving while unsafely impaired by alcohol, 2) driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or greater, 3) driving under the influence of drugs, and 4) driving under the combined influence of alcohol and some drug(s).  A driver might be charged with a single count or with multiple counts, depending on the circumstances.  

Police often encounter drivers who appear to be impaired by some substance, even when their blood alcohol level is low.  The driver might be a "lightweight" who is especially sensitive to alcohol, or he might be intoxicated by some drug(s), or by some combination of alcohol and drugs.  If police have probable cause to believe that the driver is impaired by any substance or combination of substances to such a degree that he cannot operate a vehicle safely, he will be arrested on suspicion of DUI and taken to the police station for a blood test.  

Depending on the results of that blood test and the totality of the circumstances, the DA will decide whether or not to file criminal charges against the driver.  If prosecutors believe they can prove that the driver was dangerously impaired by alcohol, they will charge the driver with violating VC 23152(a), regardless of his BAC.  If his BAC is above 0.08%, they may additionally charge the driver with violating VC 23152(b).  

If a blood test shows that a driver is impaired by drugs, he may be charged with violating VC 23152(f).  This includes legally prescribed drugs, illegal drugs, sleep aids and marijuana -- any substance(s) that may impair a driver's ability to operate a vehicle with the skill and care of a normal, sober person.  These cases are complicated because it's often hard to prove a driver's precise degree of "impairment", especially when the driver has extensive experience and a very high tolerance for some prescription medication that he has taken for years.  Our firm has even represented individuals who were accused of driving under the influence of chemotherapy drugs.

To further complicate matters, the DA can charge a driver with violating VC 23152(g) if they believe that he is impaired by the combined influence of alcohol AND drugs.  

There are many possible defenses to DUI charges, but only a qualified professional can fairly evaluate your case.  If you or a loved one has questions about DUI in California, call us for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John.  

Thanks for reading.  

Fullerton DUI Lawyer

Clean Up Your Criminal Record: Updated 2017

I wrote a post last year about the many options that can be pursued to clean up your criminal record in California.  Here's the short version of that piece:

• If you were given probation and you successfully completed the entire term without any violations, you may be eligible to have your old case dismissed. Once a case is dismissed, you may honestly state that you have no criminal convictions for most purposes. A dismissal under this section will not restore gun rights, though. 
• If you were convicted of a misdemeanor and NOT given probation, then you must wait one year from the date of your conviction or your release from custody, whichever came later. You must also prove that you have remained law-abiding since the conviction.  
• If your conviction was for a felony, the charge may be reduced to a misdemeanor in some cases. If an old felony conviction is reduced to a misdemeanor, it may restore gun rights, depending on the circumstances.  
• You must complete probation before you're eligible to apply for a dismissal. If you're still on probation, we can ask the court to terminate probation early. 

The legislature has added some new caveats over the past year to allow more types of cases to be dismissed or reduced:

• Non-traffic infractions are now eligible for dismissal under the same process.  Non-traffic infractions include things like "disturbing the peace" and "urinating in public", for example. Applicants must wait one year from the time of the conviction. 
• A conviction for engaging in prostitution under PC 647(b) can now be dismissed if the applicant can prove that he or she was the victim of human trafficking.
• If you were convicted of a felony and sentenced to county jail rather than state prison, you may now apply for a dismissal.  The waiting period depends on whether or not your sentence included "mandatory supervision".  
• If you were arrested and the case did not result in a conviction, you may be eligible to seal the record of your arrest. 

If you or a loved one has questions about cleaning up an old criminal conviction, call our office for a free attorney consultation. (714) 449-3335. Ask for John.  

Thanks for reading. 

Orange County Expungement Lawyer

What if I Get Pulled Over and My Car Smells Like Weed?

There's a lot of misinformation on this topic.  Unfortunately for a lot of my clients, that often means that they call me after they've been arrested for DUI.  Don't make that mistake.

Driving under the influence of marijuana is a DUI in California, just like driving under the influence of alcohol.  It doesn't matter if you're over 21 or if you have a doctor's recommendation to use medical marijuana.  Think of weed like alcohol -- just because you're allowed to possess it doesn't mean that you're allowed to operate a vehicle while you're under the influence.

The big difference between marijuana and alcohol is that there's no legal limit for THC and no reliable way to determine a driver's degree of impairment with weed.  Blood, urine and saliva tests cannot accurately tell us whether or not a subject is dangerously intoxicated by marijuana.  This means that marijuana DUIs are pretty arbitrary.  They often turn on the police officer's opinion based on his observations before and after the traffic stop.  The factors that I usually see listed in police reports include:

• Bad driving
• Smell of marijuana coming from the interior of the vehicle
• Driver observed smoking in a moving vehicle
• Red, glassy eyes
• Any signs that the driver is disoriented or has difficulty following instructions, etc.

The strongest evidence that the police usually gather in these cases, though, is the driver's own statements.  Way too many of my clients talk themselves into trouble after a traffic stop.  If you admit to consuming marijuana before (or while) driving, you will be arrested on suspicion of DUI. 

Without your admission of recent marijuana use, the police might not have enough evidence to arrest you.  If you keep your mouth shut and the police arrest you anyway, we'll have a much stronger defense when we appear in court.  

If you or a loved one has questions about driving under the influence of marijuana in California, call us for a free attorney consultation.  (714) 449-3335.  Ask for John.  

Thanks for reading. 

Fullerton Marijuana Lawyer