The simple act of filming police while they perform their official duties is protected by the First Amendment. The recent proliferation of cheap, ubiquitous video cameras has had a major impact on the way police do their jobs. Cops know that any contact with citizens can quickly go viral on the internet, for good or for bad. Police are more likely to act professionally when they know that they will be held accountable for their actions. So film away, post it to Youtube, get a million hits and become an internet celebrity. If the cops give you any shit, tell them I said it was OK.
The right to film the police has been consistently affirmed by the courts, most recently in the case of ACLU v. Alvarez, 679 F.3d 583 (2012). There, the ACLU successfully won an injunction to prevent enforcement of an Illinois eavesdropping statute. The law prohibited any recording of any conversation unless all parties consented to the recording, regardless of where the conversation occurred or whether the conversation was clearly audible to the public. The ACLU regularly monitors police activity in Chicago to deter and document official misconduct. They argued that the Illinois law unconstitutionally prohibited them from documenting public conduct, thereby infringing upon their right to free speech. The Federal Appellate Court agreed.
People get themselves into trouble, though, when "filming the police" becomes "interfering with police". As discussed above, you have a right to document the cops. In fact, please do. You do not have a right, however, to waste their time. Police are paid by the hour. Their salaries come from our taxes. When you waste the cops' time, you waste everyone else's tax dollars. That being said, you may not delay, obstruct or interfere with official police conduct in any way. When you stick a camera in a cop's face, believe me, he is itching for a reason to take you to jail. Section 148(a)(1) of the California Penal Code gives him the authority to do so if he believes that you are making his job more difficult or more time-consuming than necessary.
I spoke with a few current police officers (who wish to remain nameless) while researching this piece. I got the impression that each of them understood and respected the constitutional right to film official public conduct. Like most people, though, cops do not appreciate anyone making their jobs more difficult than necessary. Unlike most people, these guys carry both guns and badges. Piss off a fry cook and you might get a loogie in your hamburger. Piss off a cop and you might BE a hamburger. Here are some helpful tips that they offered for anyone who wants to film the police without being beaten and thrown in jail:
-Do not interfere with their official duties. The rest of these rules are basically different ways of reiterating this first commandment.
-Stay out of their way. They need space to do their jobs. If you crowd them, them will "feel threatened", and we know what happens when cops "feel threatened" (see previous posts re: Kelly Thomas).
-Don't ask them a bunch of questions while they are trying to work. Don't complain about how they're doing their jobs, and don't tell them that they're using excessive force. Document it, get it on film, and complain to their supervisors later, but always remember the first rule.
-If you intentionally provoke the police, don't be surprised if you get the reaction that you're looking for. Maybe have someone else hold the camera for this part.
If you or a loved one is hassled for filming police (or arrested for interfering / resisting), call my office at (714) 449-3335 for a free consultation. Ask for John.
Good luck out there and thanks for reading. Remember, don't give the cops anything to do.
Tulli,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comic relief! We all had a good belly laugh around the office after reading that. My paralegal almost fell out of her chair laughing.
I appreciate a little sarcastic humor. I recognize that post as sarcasm because only a clown college dropout would have gotten the impression that I was somehow defending police brutality. Really, only the lowest of low-grade morons would read my post as being pro-police.
My favorite part was where you compared me to Hitler. That's classic satirical hyberbole. Comedy gold, right there!
See, it's funny because I successfully defend people against PC 148 charges all the time. I have an excellent record in jury trials when my clients are accused of crimes against police. To call me a fascist is like calling Charles Barkley a Chinese midget.
Thanks for reading.
Heh. That's a snappy comeback. I like the analogy at the end.
DeleteWow, it seems Tully is angry and he's not quite sure why. When you don't know why you're angry, how can you be sure who you should be angry with?
ReplyDeleteI thought Mr. Bussman's post was excellent and I am not a fan of the police. It seemed to me that what Mr. Bssman was attempting to do was advise us on two separate things. The first, was how to legally exercise our first amendment right to video tape a police officer in the performance of his duty. The second, was how to keep from getting your teeth kicked in by an over zealous cop.
I certainly didn't feel like Mr. Bussman was acting as an advocate for law enforcement. Keep this good stuff coming Sir, you're obviously proficient at your job, as a less qualified attorney would likely have skipped over the second part and my odds of needing dental implants would have increased. Thank You!
I’ve been admirer of your website because I have got the great articles
ReplyDeletealexander begum
Suppose you're across the street filming a police encounter, of an incident that you sense/suspect someone's rights are clearly being violated... and they accuse you of 'obstruction' and 'interference' - from across the street (or even a few yards away)... then what?... Can you point to the fact THEY spoke with you first, and not vice versa?..
ReplyDeleteMerchant Blog,
ReplyDeleteIf you're across the street and not interfering with the performance of their duties, you should (in theory), be OK. If you're standing a few yards away, you're probably pushing it. Cops need to clear a space around themselves and their suspects when they're making an arrest. If they feel like you're crowding them, they get nervous. When they get nervous, they overreact. Don't give them a reason to overreact.
If I saw a cop doing something that I thought was improper, I'd film it from a safe distance. A "safe distance" is probably going to depend on a lot of different factors. I'd try to stand in a place where the camera could capture the faces and audio, but not so close that cops are repeatedly telling me to move back.
If you're arrested for interfering, then your defense is going to depend on the specific facts of your case -- What does the video show? What did the witnesses see? What did the cops write in their reports? Were the cops acting reasonably? Were you acting reasonably? Were the cops actually performing their lawful duties? If so, did you interfere with those duties? If so, to what degree? Etc.
Generally, it doesn't matter who spoke to who first. They only need to prove that they were attempting to lawfully do their jobs, and that you came along and made their jobs more difficult or time-consuming that necessary.
Hope that helps. Good luck.